News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Elon Musk makes $43B unsolicited bid to take Twitter private by bmitc on Thursday April 14, 2022 @08:34AM (#31026057)
> I don't advocate that speech shouldn't have consequences.

We already have free speech and consequences. Twitter and Musk have nothing to do with free speech issues.

You want absolute freedom of speech but then you want to limit a company and platform in what it says, which it does by allowing or disallowing certain content? And you would prefer a single person, who has a history of devious activity, having totalitarian control over said company and platform? It doesn’t make sense.

Re:Elon Musk makes $43B unsolicited bid to take Twitter private by mrtksn on Thursday April 14, 2022 @08:44AM (#31026169)
> We already have free speech and consequences

No we don't have it on the Internet. On the internet(including YC), the norm is that your speech is removed and/or you are blocked from further speech (as a consequence) if you say the wrong thing where "wrong" is defined by the platform operators.

Musk may choose to make Twitter an absolute free speech platform but he might choose to make it something else. I hope for the former. He might end up to turn it into something horrible or just leave it as is but I don't know why would you spend $50B to do just that.