Re:Wikipedia RFC to stop accepting cryptocurrencies passes b...
by asterix_pano on Wednesday April 13, 2022 @09:45AM
(#31014594)
Nano is a very interesting one. The foundation developing it focuses on one thing: developing the best digital currency. They don't implement smart-contracts to make it as efficient as possible for example. The feeless aspect is what makes it great but also maybe vulnerable at the same time: the foundation will have to look for external finance a bit like the Linux foundation of which they are taking inspiration.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Wikipedia RFC to stop accepting cryptocurrencies passes b...
by davidgerard on Wednesday April 13, 2022 @11:16AM
(#31015664)
and their super-fast blockchain manages 70tps ... compare hundreds of tps on other non-PoW blockchains, e.g. private Ethereum
Re:Wikipedia RFC to stop accepting cryptocurrencies passes b...
by asterix_pano on Wednesday April 13, 2022 @12:00PM
(#31016290)
I believe it has one of the best TPS for a decentralised system, and this can be improved with better hardware when the need for higher TPS comes. Now, as it stands today, you can transact on Nano with a 0.4s confirmation time, so higher TPS is not a necessity.
Re:Wikipedia RFC to stop accepting cryptocurrencies passes b...
by asterix_pano on Wednesday April 13, 2022 @12:02PM
(#31016314)
some interesting data on that point: https://forum.nano.org/t/nano-stress-tests-measuring-bps-cps...
Re:Wikipedia RFC to stop accepting cryptocurrencies passes b...
by SideburnsOfDoom on Thursday April 14, 2022 @08:08AM
(#31025792)
I have no desire to waste time and brain on "look up Block lattice tech"
and I know that you tend to "take one for the team" in this kind of matter.
So. Block lattice tech: real or Malarkey?