asterix_pano

When I hear 9x smaller, I visualize 9 small items taken as much space as the big one, I find it quite clear.

Why not? Aren't you mixing gender and sex?

Because the effects are much worse on developing brains.

is there really nothing to do?

Did you know they put nose rings with spikes on the calfs so they don't drink their mother's milk? https://as1.ftcdn.net/jpg/03/06/17/72/1000_F_306177230_izPAv...

That is not how most of the chicken is raised (over 70 billions are slaughtered per year).

you can also use https://nano-gpt.com/ if privacy is necessary

Because almost no administration was ready to regulate it until recently. Payment and remittances are such obvious use cases but if every transaction create a tax event, it's also too cumbersome to implement for most merchant.

I am also amazed by the resistance to change here as there is a system clearly more efficient and transparent. It's just a matter of time in my opinion. BTW you can remove the (nearly) in "(nearly) costless", some solutions provide 0 fees and no inflation.

Looks very interesting. Does it allow to plot lines of varying thickness?

Thanks for sharing, this format really puts things into perspective.

If you don't want to necessarily have to pick between one or the other, there are services like this one that let you basically access all the major LLMs and only pay per use: https://nano-gpt.com/

I wish a crypto like Nano would already be a solution for this kind of use case. Why is it still so hard in 2024 to accept payments globally, while the internet works everywhere?

why not use something that's better to transact (less or no fees and faster) ?

Training takes many years though.

Maybe it's cynical to think that way but maybe it's a way to crush the competition before it even begins: I would probably not invest in researching LLMs now, knowing that there is a company that will very likely produce a model close enough for free and I will likely never make back the investment.

I suppose that the fact that it's too shallow could be improved by applying this approach recursively on each sub-topic, then synthesise them and create a narrative around them.

It's very nice, love it

Depends, it's not clear yet that "code is law" or is not.

We have more than enough food for everyone. Actually, we waste most of agricultural land to grow crops to feed animals that we eat later on, which is extremely inefficient, like a 10 to 1 calorie conversion rate. It's also cruel, bad for the environment, etc.

You can use a service such as nano-gpt.com where you pay for every single query only. I rarely spend more than $20 a month and I can choose whichever model I want.

Llama_index basically does that. You have even some tuto using Streamlit that creates a UI around it for you.

They are not enforced the same way to all, though.

Why BCH and not NANO? You like to wait and pay fees?

There are now lots of efficient cryptos and some that can run on a single wind turbine. But I am with you, hoping the energyvore ones die as fast as possible.

Where does it stop though? Are you fine putting everyone else in danger so you feel safe? Are you buying a tank next?

Not to 99% of the world, but to 99% of the people in an egocentric society.

It is also fair to hate the player, as often they are making the decisions consciously. They are supporting the game, which would die if there was no demand. Same as the meat industry for example. It's too easy to always put the fault on some higher instance.

Why is the second one a better proposition?

Having internet money that is cross border, instant, efficient and censorship resistant is difficult to build, so it takes time, but it's incredibly valuable as it removes a lot of frictions.