When critics diverge so far from the role of answering the question "what's a movie I would enjoy" then no, they're not doing their job. I'm not sure exactly what job they're doing now, but I'd say by and large they aren't doing anything I'm interested in.
That's like having a tourist blog that only talks about places that other tourist blogs like to blog about but not places people want to visit! Not useful for the (assumed) intended audience.
There's no critic that can predict what you'll like, since tastes in films differ so much.
I have a friend I don't discuss movies with much, because we disagree on pretty much every single one we've both seen; it's literally impossible for a single critic to directly tell us both what we'd like.
Just cause someone might not know my specific tastes isn't a reason that everyone should have to be recommended videos that most people will predictably not enjoy.
That's like saying since there's no way I'd know what music you might like, then you should listen to King Crimson since it's highly respected in prog Rock circles. Yes, sure, and most people would hate it.
Critics watch movies from a different perspective of an audience member. Some really get pulled in by the technical details of the film while others are drawn to the story. Meanwhile the average movie goer's sole concern is entertainment.
The best way to use movie critics is like a discovery service. Find several (4 or 5) whose opinions you find agreeable (and maybe a few that you don't agree). Then go look at the movies those critics liked that you have never heard and watch them.
Finally, if you have made it this far, I recommend you watch "It Happened One Night" (1934). It's a romcom with Clark Gable and Claudette Colbert, directed by Frank Capra, and it was the first movie to win the Oscar for Best Picture, Director, Actor, Actress, and Screen play. It's really good!