She was never an artist I cared about. I just assumed she was a “teenybopper queen.”
The song clearly had one -maybe two- musicians in the background, playing a sampler, while she sang. Maybe she played the sampler.
I realized it probably cost almost nothing to record that song.
She didn’t have a regular band, and probably threw one together, when she toured.
I suspect that many artists do the same.
I’m an older guy with musical tastes formed in the 1970s, but I find a lot of this new independent music stimulating, enjoyable, and very competently made. When there’s a song I particularly like, I’ve sometimes looked up the artist online, and often he or she has had only a few hundred plays on YouTube and a few dozen followers on Instagram. It must be really tough for young musicians trying to make a career out of music now.
Not quite the same, but in that world though
...which sort of applies to a lot of Hot 100 artists as well. A good songwriter writes it, a talented producer makes it sound good, and a well-known personality sings it (with varying accuracy) and has their name put on it as the "artist".
It's a spectrum. At one end you've got The Velvet Underground playing around a single mic hooked directly to a reel-to-reel, and at the other end you've got neural-net generated lofi hip hop beats to relax/study to. If you sort artists by play count on Spotify, the top results will be all over this spectrum (but mostly in the middle, I think).