https://www.alaskasnewssource.com/2022/04/04/cancellations-c...
> An Alaska Airlines captain, according to a news release from the airline, averages about $341,000 a year, but pilots say it’s not just about money — they also want work rule changes, job security and scheduling flexibility.
So, money doesn't seem to be it alone...
> work rule changes
interesting.
> if you're not a senior captain in a major airline, most pilots earn very low wages
Just like you are doing here.
But ya, _people_ are just uninformed and building a narrative that isn't there.
Even if the narratives are inherently false, can't we at least consider why the mistrust is present instead of essentially accusing _people_ of a lack of logic and borderline calling _people_ crazy?
Other airlines pay for this time, Alaska does not. Which is why they can't find pilots. Their overall pay is crap.
https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-coronavirus-pilots...
If you have another source, feel free to provide it, but I've found no other source for this claim aside from Facebook memes.
Maybe it's because you're casting doubt without actually considering the evidence in front of you.
> more than 97% of its staff received at least one shot after the deadline this week.
If pilots and copilots are massively, massively over-represented in the remaining 3%, you might have a point, but that is a huge and unsupported assumption.
"airline industry" being the differentiator between what you listed and the original article's claim.
Also, the number you're referencing is United Airline's, so not even Alaskan.
> United Airlines mandated vaccines for staff in August and said more than 97% of its staff received at least one shot after the deadline this week.
All those discrepancies aside, you probably have a point. I don't personally believe it's _this_ reason alone, but I think it's at least a part of the issue.
https://asiatimes.com/2020/09/does-it-even-matter-who-first-...
https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-voltaire-quote/fac...
If you read the first article, you'll see the author is _really_ torn about whether a phrase should be attacked based on the original author.
I personally don't think the author changes the meaning behind a quote. I _do_ think the context matters. I don't see being alt-right-nazi-quadrune adjacent as a crime. I don't hold the views of the original author.
Hmm. I wonder. Why. That was. Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.......