Re:The Mathematics of Artificial Intelligence (2022)
by WithinReason on Monday April 11, 2022 @05:18AM
(#30986395)
Is it correct to use "we" if there is only one author?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The Mathematics of Artificial Intelligence (2022)
by rcap on Monday April 11, 2022 @06:02AM
(#30986656)
It's standard practice for mathematics papers. Some people like to view it as "we, the author and the reader".
Re:The Mathematics of Artificial Intelligence (2022)
by mdp2021 on Monday April 11, 2022 @05:52AM
(#30986591)
A form of "plural majestatis" which paradoxically implies that the individual author has only relative importance
(«paradoxically» as the majestas itself is founded on representing something higher, not of some high status of the individual which happens to be endowed - it may sound like boasting but on the contrary it would be a downplay of the individual).
In other contexts, that "we" can have even more foundations: "I could never have done this without the work of others", "Not just me but all those who think alike" etc.
Re:The Mathematics of Artificial Intelligence (2022)
by woopwoop on Monday April 11, 2022 @08:24AM
(#30987730)
Using the "royal we" is standard in mathematics. If you ever see someone do this in ordinary writing you can bump up your odds that they're a mathematician. Another giveaway is using "modulo" to mean "except for".
Re:The Mathematics of Artificial Intelligence (2022)
by hatmatrix on Monday April 11, 2022 @07:23AM
(#30987202)
It's the "royal 'we'"
Re:The Mathematics of Artificial Intelligence (2022)
by Iwan-Zotow on Tuesday April 12, 2022 @10:53AM
(#31003531)
me and cockroaches in my head