Re:The physicalization of metamathematics and the implicatio...
by vaillant on Thursday April 07, 2022 @01:29PM
(#30947677)
I think that identifying the ruliad with the "logos" makes sense - the idea that there's some underlying abstract shape to the universe that makes rationality possible in the first place.
Re:The physicalization of metamathematics and the implicatio...
by ganzuul on Thursday April 07, 2022 @01:52PM
(#30948014)
Perhaps we can back-propagate physics through mathematics to discover physical proof of logos? Then we could substantiate the claim that reality is not illusion composed of ever fluctuating qualia.
That discovery would certainly fill this one with wonder.
---
My own attempt at what Wolfram is doing resulted in:
1: f(a,a)
2: f(a,b)
I call the former introspection and the latter is regular old composition. This seems to be a taxonomy of everything my discerning mind is capable of and hence the limit of what aspects of human experience I can peer review. The rest (the bulk) is mysticism and always-valid personal experience.
---
“Whatever we call reality, it is revealed to us only through the active construction in which we participate.” – Ilya Prigogine, Order Out of Chaos: Man’s New Dialogue with Nature (1984)