Re:Please stop calling it “magic” (2017)
by boffinism on Wednesday April 06, 2022 @12:14PM
(#30933927)
Do you believe that things that you find fatiguing to read are also going to 'ruin' your eyesight if you try? Is there any evidence for this?
Re:Please stop calling it “magic” (2017)
by rectang on Wednesday April 06, 2022 @12:22PM
(#30934069)
No, I don't believe that would affect my particular impairment. Do you believe that the only valid metric for accessibility is whether a site is actively damaging eyesight?
Re:Please stop calling it “magic” (2017)
by boffinism on Wednesday April 06, 2022 @12:26PM
(#30934129)
No, but my original comment wasn't about accessibility (of which I'm a proponent, by the way), it was about whether the specific sentence "It almost seems like this was intentionally created to ruin eyesight" was unhelpful hyperbole.
This is not exactly news, there are whole guidelines on contrast published and backed by copious research.
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Accessibility/U...
I understand that some people are unaware of this issue. For those that are open to becoming part of the solution when it is brought to their attention, I hold no resentment.
But for those that belligerently minimize the problem, for example characterizing the challenge as "I don't like how this website looks"... not so much.
Same with organizations that surely know better but continue to present problematic low-contrast interfaces. (Discord, I'm looking at you.)