there was a call from UN for an independent investigation into Bucha claims, hindered by UK. Somehow for you there is no problem here.

Source for that?

I mean a source that's different from 'some Russian government asshole on Telegram' picked up by Tass. Some independent source I mean.

Until and unless Maxar agrees to provide images from their satellites for any other date between 19th March - 3rd April, any reporting on Bucha should not be taken as truthful without further investigation. For some reason Maxar denied access to such images [1] [2].

If you're interested in an independent take on who is aiming at civilians, consider reading this thread in Portuguese (scroll both ways) [3]: > Here we have Vita Zaverukha, the "new Joan of Arc" according to the Spanish section of Elle Magazine, shooting Donbass civilians with an RPG7 for pure fun and psychopathy.

[1] https://telegra-ph.translate.goog/Stoit-li-doveryat-sputniko...

[2] https://telegra-ph.translate.goog/Situaciya-v-Buche-CHto-byl...

[3] https://twitter.com/camaradabruno/status/1500248165970329603

Any independent sources to verify anything you posted? Also, this doesn't answer my original question for the other troll.

Let's not forget that all of this, the reason people are talking about this in the first place, is the fact that Russian armed forces are currently occupying the land of a foreign sovereign nation. We seem to forget all of that and people get into arguments about which color armband or whether or not something is a manipulated pixel. Russians need to fuck right off from there, end of story.

Everything else, including the unverified garbage you keep posting repeatedly, is part of https://www.rand.org/pubs/perspectives/PE198.html