News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The next Google by technothrasher on Tuesday April 05, 2022 @07:54PM (#30926681)
> Anyone I watch older than 50 years old

Hey, now wait a second there, you young whipper-snapper. I'm sitting here reading HN while I install Debian on an XCP-ng VM, and I hear I can't understand whether Google results are good or not? There are plenty of us over 50 that actually lived the early internet and watched it first-hand transform into what it is today.

Re:The next Google by smitty1e on Tuesday April 05, 2022 @10:22PM (#30927762)
Indeed, there was a time when Slashdot was as tech-heavy and full of learning as HN.
Re:The next Google by throwaway2037 on Wednesday April 06, 2022 @02:21AM (#30929012)
What happened to Slashdot? Around 2000, I was a regular reader. Then, I fell away, but I cannot remember why.
Re:The next Google by pers0n on Wednesday April 06, 2022 @09:12AM (#30931576)
All the arguments were the same over and over. I remember reading the same comments that would come up all the time, the discussion got old.

Plus the topics were very Linux, DRM focused. Digg had newer more interesting tech topics

Re:The next Google by throwaway2037 on Monday April 11, 2022 @08:07AM (#30987562)
This is a great reply. Real question: Why hasn't the same happened to HN? To be fair, there are some arguments that play out over and over again: SF crime & homelessness, Bay Area housing, US taxes, central banks "printing money", office vs work-from-home, feeling forced to adopt liberal social views / stances at a tech company (Black Lives Matter, LGBTIQ+), etc.

And somehow, there is still enough good, new content to keep the conversations fresh. Some of the best are when someone shares a personal story, then there are tens or hundreds of follow-up posts -- generally supportive or inquisitive.

Re:The next Google by smitty1e on Tuesday April 12, 2022 @03:53AM (#30999793)
HN works because of the effort applied to downvote garbage replies and keep the tone sober ond collegial.

I've had a number of replies get hammered, unfairly in my view.

Yet the signal-to-noise ratio benefits overall if we eat a little Type I error now and then.

Re:The next Google by redmen on Tuesday April 05, 2022 @07:59PM (#30926713)
I meant 60 ;)