News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Academe is a hotbed of craven snitches by scandox on Tuesday April 05, 2022 @05:23PM (#30925221)
> First let us pause to consider our terms: Was Schlissel’s narc a “snitch” or a “whistle-blower”? Whistle-blowers are generally attempting to topple or thwart the powerful, and Schlissel was certainly powerful. But the reported offense was, in the words of a lawyer I spoke with, “a nothingburger.” Let us provisionally define snitching as turning someone in anonymously, for either minor or nonexistent offenses, or pretextually. Also: using institutional mechanisms to kneecap rivals, harass enemies, settle scores and grudges, or advantage oneself. Not to mention squealing on someone for social-media posts and joining online mobs to protest exercises of academic and intellectual freedom.

For those who bravely make it to the 3rd paragraph.

Re:Academe is a hotbed of craven snitches by ars on Tuesday April 05, 2022 @05:43PM (#30925413)
So if it's a "nothingburger", then why is the administration not just ignoring it?

You can't have that kind of harassment without the assistance of those you are reporting to. Being how I'm not there, I'm going to defer to the administrators to decide what's important and what's not.

Re:Academe is a hotbed of craven snitches by scandox on Wednesday April 06, 2022 @05:50AM (#30930247)
I'm just quoting the article which attempts to address the issues of terminology you raised. Without discussing his terms your original comment lacked relevance.