Re:Study Tips from Richard Feynman
by abecedarius on Sunday April 03, 2022 @09:22PM
(#30902495)
> Feynman suggests he got a buzz out of puzzles his whole life
Yes, you tend to get good at what gives you a buzz, in a compounding way. But I expect 'buzz' isn't random, either: it'd make sense for personality formation to notice when you show talent at something valued by some of the people around you, and flip some motivational switches in your developing mind. This seems like a better bet for your genes than trying to engineer your motivation and talent towards a common target separately.
Re:Study Tips from Richard Feynman
by throwaway9278 on Monday April 04, 2022 @03:09AM
(#30904028)
No. We do know this. We know cognitive ability varies between people. It's obvious to everyone who's competed with others in mental competitions, and it's born out by a century of psychological research.
You can't just train to win the Putnam if you don't have the talents. Have you ever sat and worked problems with someone exceptional in that area? Try it if you get the chance. The variation in ability will blow you away.
Then he also studied math and then won the Putnum. How would he have gone without doing all that "non-study" about problem solving and looking at problems from different ways and just doing math quite well? Maybe he was so brilliant he still would have won? I suspect not. How many others sitting for the Putnum had done similar amounts of the same quality work by way of preparation?
Genius? Or learned and honed? Both? In what proportions? Whatever I think about it is "Just like my opinion, man." Right?