> Technically someone does own the copyright to these words, and if they are able to prove it they could sue every project that uses or refers to it, which is a troubling thought.
That seems unlikely to be true. Recipes can't be copyrighted because they're functional. Legal licenses are also functional.
(What's that? You think source code is functional? Shows what you know.)
That seems unlikely to be true. Recipes can't be copyrighted because they're functional. Legal licenses are also functional.
(What's that? You think source code is functional? Shows what you know.)