saw your flagged response, from your source it is defined as:

"The Gish gallop is a rhetorical technique in which a person in a debate attempts to overwhelm their opponent by providing an excessive number of arguments with no regard for the accuracy or strength of those arguments."

since I was responding in good faith and wasn't making any argument as opposed to a valid reality that's easy to experience, is this is a cognitive limitation for you to feel as if you have been overwhelmed by excessive number of arguments? because that would say more about you and your ability to have this conversation at all, like maybe your worldview is incapable of being more plastic