Re:Zee: A modern text editor for the terminal written in Rust
by svnpenn on Wednesday March 30, 2022 @12:56AM
(#30851623)
Just look at the readme. It says 100 FPS. Vim isn't even close to that, and Vim sucks with large files.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Zee: A modern text editor for the terminal written in Rust
by akho on Wednesday March 30, 2022 @03:54AM
(#30852483)
The only benchmark I could find is https://pavelfatin.com/typing-with-pleasure/#editor-benchmar... , showing GVim to be quite a bit better than that. For terminal Vim, terminal latency dominates.
Re:Zee: A modern text editor for the terminal written in Rust
by svnpenn on Wednesday March 30, 2022 @07:08AM
(#30853595)
That page doesn't list FPS at all.
Re:Zee: A modern text editor for the terminal written in Rust
by akho on Wednesday March 30, 2022 @07:53AM
(#30853903)
What do you think FPS means in the context of a terminal text editor? The linked page is pretty clear in what the author means: “Cursor movement and edits render under 10ms”. So FPS = 1 / latency. The link I gave measures latency; < 10ms is > 100 FPS.
(Though I doubt the statement re: Zee < 10ms latency in practical terms. I think only xterm and Terminal.app are consistently below that in terms of pure terminal latency)
Re:Zee: A modern text editor for the terminal written in Rust
by svnpenn on Wednesday March 30, 2022 @11:15AM
(#30856317)
I said FPS, I didn't say latency. Please stop trying to argue against a point I'm not even making.