Reinstating our SAT/ACT requirement for future admissions cycles

Re:Reinstating our SAT/ACT requirement for future admissions... by adfgadfgaery on Monday March 28, 2022 @02:44PM (#30834038)

>it follows that social mobility is pretty much dead. It is a bleak vision.

I have always found the idea of social mobility depressing. It assumes that we will always have a hierarchy, with some people who are powerful and prestigious and others who are poor and always feel inadequate. It assumes that we will always have an underclass but at least people can leave it.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Reinstating our SAT/ACT requirement for future admissions... by zozbot234 on Monday March 28, 2022 @03:21PM (#30834476)

The kind of social mobility that SAT has some influence on is not really about "power and prestige", which I also think of as generally pathological dynamics. It's literally about how competent and professional you want to be, and how well you can perform your work duties. It's social mobility within the 'working' class, not really away from it.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Reinstating our SAT/ACT requirement for future admissions... by hkt on Monday March 28, 2022 @03:08PM (#30834339)

Yes. The old saying among Labour party socialists in the UK was "rise with your class, not above it". They were in favour of a high floor on living standards and a low ceiling on wealth. It isn't a stretch to think that a more even playing field would be a better substitute for mobility.

[ Parent | on HN ]