absolutely not, LGPL is LGPL no matter who you are. Such a restriction would make it incompatible with the LGPL (or even any free software license).

After reading their licensing that is now obvious. There is a group at my megacorp that ises it heavily from windows and they pay for tons of licenses. I'm not sure why. Unless they are static linking some of the gpl v3 modules and don't want to release code, I don't know why anyone would select the commercial qt license.

There's historically been a metric ton of FUD around this