News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:State of OSS Monetization by gus_massa on Saturday March 26, 2022 @04:22PM (#30815033)
> You believe that OSS would be better off with more bribes ...

I agree, but I'm very confused about the original proposal because I think fiat is not good enough for bribes.

Re:State of OSS Monetization by cryptica on Saturday March 26, 2022 @06:37PM (#30815994)
Bribes are not suitable for aligning financial incentives because they are illegal (both to solicit and to offer).

On the other hand, if a financial instrument exists which is coupled to a specific economic service, then no solicitation or offering step is necessary in order to align incentives between a provider and a supplier.

Also, note that this is not insider trading. Insider trading means that a trade was made after an event occurred but before that event was made public. In this case, the trade is made first, before the event occurred.

Re:State of OSS Monetization by gus_massa on Sunday March 27, 2022 @12:38PM (#30821627)
I thing the GP is not talking about literal bribes that are ilegal. The idea is that every time someone fills a feature request the maintainer replies with a link to a bitcoin address a price, and until the money is in that address the maintainer does not implement the feature.