Re:Our fundamental right to shame and shun the New York Times
by RangerScience on Tuesday March 22, 2022 @08:57PM
(#30773593)
> What we have now
But this isn't a new thing, not even a little bit. The House Unamerican Committee, and anti-abolitionists (as in slavery) are both examples of exactly this from history. Arguably, worse and more extreme because of all the, you know, death and murder.
Re:Our fundamental right to shame and shun the New York Times
by lliamander on Tuesday March 22, 2022 @11:57PM
(#30774774)
Of course political violence is not a new thing. And given your choice of examples, I feel compelled to remind you that it is certainly not just a right-wing phenomenon.
I am simply stating the ideal, and how the present state of affairs differs from that ideal. I would also add that we are the downslope from a relatively high-water mark period of free speech, and I see no value in regressing in the manner we have.
Re:Our fundamental right to shame and shun the New York Times
by RangerScience on Wednesday March 23, 2022 @12:52PM
(#30780510)
> we are the downslope from a relatively high-water
Thing is, I'm not sure that's true. When do you think that high-water mark was?
Re:Our fundamental right to shame and shun the New York Times
by yeetsfromhell on Tuesday March 22, 2022 @08:03PM
(#30773223)
Once US society made the jump from "right vs wrong" to "good vs evil" it became an intractable problem.
@dang: was this a mistakenly flagged post? I don't think what I said was off topic or objectionable...to anyone, really.
I'm not arguing we shouldn't be able to shame or shun (the NYT itself would be my preferred target). I think the idea is that we should aspire to resolving our differences through dialog. What we have now is a crowd of people who feel that dialog is no longer necessary, and that to even simply engage in dialog with one's political enemies is bad and might somehow taint you.