News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Predicting Best Picture winners using coughs and sneezes by eganist on Tuesday March 22, 2022 @08:40AM (#30765312)
That's a hot take. What didn't you like about it, specifically? Aside from the best score ever made by Hans Zimmer?
Re:Predicting Best Picture winners using coughs and sneezes by tokai on Tuesday March 22, 2022 @09:10AM (#30765603)
It has always weirded me out that Zimmer keeps getting jobs. His overly pathetic drone has always been like a parody soundtrack. But people plays it straight as if he is actually making something that adds to the movies. Dune was peak Zimmer so if you like him I guess it makes sense to call it his best. But to me it was him making fun of himself with a straightface and nobody calls him out on it.
Re:Predicting Best Picture winners using coughs and sneezes by Tycho on Tuesday March 22, 2022 @09:35AM (#30765896)
The score was actually quite thoughtful, attempting to use rhythm and harmony and vocal style that was fitting for the universe, ie. very far removed from our current styles.
Re:Predicting Best Picture winners using coughs and sneezes by eganist on Tuesday March 22, 2022 @09:49AM (#30766056)
Please give this a watch with an open mind: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=93A1ryc-WW0

I promise it's worth your time. Being honest, I fell in love with the score before I even knew it was Zimmer's, and once I found out, my first thought was "of course."

To each their own, but if you want an idea of what went into the score, that video above is insightful.

Re:Predicting Best Picture winners using coughs and sneezes by tokai on Tuesday March 22, 2022 @10:02AM (#30766189)
I have seen it. Appreciate you sharing it though. Point is I don't buy his angle. To me it wasn't a fresh take on sounds of the future. It meshed bad with the movie and was a bunch of trite tropes like detached arabic-like wails and dry buzzers. Soundcloud is full of amateur electronic artists doing it better. But in the end its all taste, and I wouldn't call the movie (and soundtrack) bad. Just not anything near good. I'm kind of envious of you who like it.
Re:Predicting Best Picture winners using coughs and sneezes by zuminator on Tuesday March 22, 2022 @10:39AM (#30766635)
Would you mind a giving a few links of SoundCloud artists doing it better? I love weird atmospheric spacey music but it too often sounds derivative.
Re:Predicting Best Picture winners using coughs and sneezes by magicalhippo on Tuesday March 22, 2022 @09:10AM (#30765608)
While I loved the overall production, for me the choice of actors for several of the side characters actually made it feel like a more generic Hollywood action movie.

For me it had been better to pick less well-used actors than Jason Momoa, Josh Brolin, Javier Bardem etc. Just robbed it of some of the mystique I think.

Re:Predicting Best Picture winners using coughs and sneezes by theshrike79 on Tuesday March 22, 2022 @09:15AM (#30765660)
You need big names if you want big bucks nowadays.

Unless you're a studio onto yourself, there's no way you can get $150M+ of funding for movie with only no-names as leads.

Re:Predicting Best Picture winners using coughs and sneezes by magicalhippo on Tuesday March 22, 2022 @09:29AM (#30765816)
Not saying they had to go no-name though, plenty of good known actors out there who hasn't been in a bunch of blockbuster movies recently etc.

But I get what you're saying. Sad, because it really detracted from the movie for me.

Re:Predicting Best Picture winners using coughs and sneezes by theshrike79 on Tuesday March 22, 2022 @05:44PM (#30771979)
Mid-price movies disappeared when streaming became a thing.

We either get low-budget stuff (10-20 million), mostly horror. Or movies that are huge gigantic blockbusters that MUST succeed.

The mid-price stuff is gone. The ones that have enough budget to make a director's vision come true, but not so much that it brings in people from The Company suggesting their pet things to be added.

Re:Predicting Best Picture winners using coughs and sneezes by magicalhippo on Tuesday March 22, 2022 @06:42PM (#30772558)
I'm sure they're out there, but it just boggles my mind that someone would decide to go watch Dune or not based on say Jason Momoa having a few minutes on screen.
Re:Predicting Best Picture winners using coughs and sneezes by kevinventullo on Tuesday March 22, 2022 @01:04PM (#30768648)
Totally agree. Casting both Bardem and Brolin was particularly rough for me since my mind jumped immediately to No Country.
Re:Predicting Best Picture winners using coughs and sneezes by rado on Tuesday March 22, 2022 @09:47AM (#30766028)
Jason Momoa was 100% Jason Momoa. His (lack of) characterisation was so bad I stared at his scenes in disbelief.
Re:Predicting Best Picture winners using coughs and sneezes by bena on Tuesday March 22, 2022 @09:55AM (#30766125)
To be fair, Patrick Stewart was 100% Patrick Stewart when he played the role.
Re:Predicting Best Picture winners using coughs and sneezes by jhbadger on Tuesday March 22, 2022 @10:13AM (#30766330)
Although that's really only recognizable in hindsight. In 1984 Stewart was still a fairly obscure character actor who had minor parts in BBC shows like I, Claudius.
Re:Predicting Best Picture winners using coughs and sneezes by rado on Tuesday March 22, 2022 @09:51AM (#30766074)
The first half was about world building. It was atmospheric and interesting, however elusive. Right in the middle when the s** hit the fan, the film started sinking in the quicksand of plotting and by the end the director was MIA. The second half was so Hollywood I felt it was written by Kathleen Kennedy.