Re:How Zillow's homebuying scheme lost $881M
by xenadu02 on Sunday March 20, 2022 @06:34AM
(#30741551)
As I noted above this is not really true anymore. My agent told me flat out that sellers (read: seller's agents) are not impressed with all-cash offers anymore. As long as you make a no-contingencies offer that's plenty good enough. They might ask if you have a 5-10% reserve just in case the appraisal comes in a bit low but in the three offers we made that never came up, even against other buyers offering all cash.
Getting a mortgage approved was also easier than I expected; when you move into Jumbo territory and have more than 20% cash to put down the bank seems to assume if you were industrious enough, lucky enough, or connected enough to come up with $500k, $1m, or whatever cash then you're probably good for the loan.
They also counted unvested RSUs as assets at a slight discount to the average stock price (I think it was the previous 90 day average?).
Re:How Zillow's homebuying scheme lost $881M
by Dylan16807 on Friday March 18, 2022 @05:35PM
(#30727851)
> If there's any kind of financing involved, the bank will need to approve the purchase, slowing down the process, which is what a cash offer bypasses.
That's not "already secured" then, is it?
> no one is buying a house with cash in their bank, not even rich people
They most certainly are. Tons of real estate sales here (Silicon Valley) are all-cash because the other people making offers are also all-cash, so the only way to make a competitive offer is if it is all-cash.
So regular people who need a mortgage are completely shut out of the market.