News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:How Zillow's homebuying scheme lost $881M by programmarchy on Friday March 18, 2022 @02:13PM (#30725607)
If you have a family home, you probably don’t want 8 college students moving into the house next door to you. This was a restriction in my college town. As a student, I didn’t like it, but as a homeowner with a family, I completely understand.
Re:How Zillow's homebuying scheme lost $881M by jjav on Friday March 18, 2022 @05:15PM (#30727621)
> but as a homeowner with a family, I completely understand.

Why do you understand? Why would you care how many people live next door?

There are potential negatives, sure. Like noise or making a mess outside. But those are already covered by other ordinances, so just enforce those.

As a homeowner with a family, I wouldn't care if there are 50 people stuffed living in the house next door. As long as they're quiet and don't make a mess, it's none of my business.

Re:How Zillow's homebuying scheme lost $881M by KptMarchewa on Friday March 18, 2022 @03:33PM (#30726514)
Most people in the world live and raise families in the conditions where they don't control what happens behind the floor, walls and ceilings. This seems like very strong entitlement.
Re:How Zillow's homebuying scheme lost $881M by programmarchy on Friday March 18, 2022 @03:54PM (#30726740)
Most people in the world don't have time to post on HN, or even have the privilege of knowing it exists. You posting a reply here is a very strong entitlement.

But if they did, they would probably come here and reply that they don't want 8 drunken college bros constantly partying next to their house either.

Re:How Zillow's homebuying scheme lost $881M by notch656a on Friday March 18, 2022 @04:24PM (#30727057)
62% of the world has access to internet. HN is also free. There is no vetting process to see that you are wealthy. Somewhere like philippines, even the dirt poor know English, so English isn't necessarily a barrier either.

Personal I live in a SFH, and I have a family. Even though I don't want 8 drunken bros living next to me, they have as much right to exist as my rather loud and surely annoying toddler has.

Re:How Zillow's homebuying scheme lost $881M by MiroF on Friday March 18, 2022 @02:30PM (#30725794)
If you want to control who lives next to you, feel free to buy the neighboring properties.
Re:How Zillow's homebuying scheme lost $881M by Drdrdrq on Friday March 18, 2022 @06:04PM (#30728118)
That wouldn't help much - there would still be neighbors bordering your (now bigger) property, just further away. You need to buy an island instead.
Re:How Zillow's homebuying scheme lost $881M by scatters on Friday March 18, 2022 @05:10PM (#30727561)
Elsewhere on the thread you pointed out that fair housing laws mean that you don't get to control who lives next to you even if you're renting out those properties. So your only option would be to leave them empty.
Re:How Zillow's homebuying scheme lost $881M by MiroF on Friday March 18, 2022 @05:20PM (#30727676)
Yes, you're correct.
Re:How Zillow's homebuying scheme lost $881M by programmarchy on Friday March 18, 2022 @03:15PM (#30726334)
Thankfully, I don't live in ancapistan, so I can vote instead.
Re:How Zillow's homebuying scheme lost $881M by vkou on Friday March 18, 2022 @04:44PM (#30727282)
Yes, and by voting the way that you do, you are creating a housing crisis.

I'd like for people expressing these political preferences to not be allowed to live in my neighbourhood either, but unlike you, I also recognize that you have as much right to live there as those 8 college students.

Re:How Zillow's homebuying scheme lost $881M by conanbatt on Friday March 18, 2022 @06:22PM (#30728310)
Actually if you live in the bay area, you live in an oligarchy. A great part of the renters in the area cannot vote and thus are not represented in this matter.

If foreigners could vote in San Francisco, the majority of which are renters, it would overwhelmingly crush this position.

Re:How Zillow's homebuying scheme lost $881M by Dylan16807 on Friday March 18, 2022 @05:27PM (#30727759)
8 people in an entire house? I don't see the problem.

3 college students could just about as easily be bad neighbors as 8.

Unless the idea is that 3 students would be too poor to live in that neighborhood, in which case a rule like that is even worse than I thought.