News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Apple M1 Ultra's 64-Core GPU Fails to Dethrone the Mighty... by nottorp on Friday March 18, 2022 @07:19AM (#30720744)
However the 3090 eats more power than the whole mac system? That’s a compromise I’m very willing to make.
Re:Apple M1 Ultra's 64-Core GPU Fails to Dethrone the Mighty... by komuher on Friday March 18, 2022 @07:28AM (#30720820)
3090 is on Samsung 8nm 2+years old node so it will always be worse and still apple gpu claims are always oversaturated and its good people are talking about it considering apple propaganda of FASTEST CONSUMER GPU.

Despite this m1 ultra gpu is a big step for all people intrested in apple market and DL/ML workloads

Re:Apple M1 Ultra's 64-Core GPU Fails to Dethrone the Mighty... by danieldk on Friday March 18, 2022 @08:22AM (#30721252)
3090 is on Samsung 8nm 2+years old node so it will always be worse

While the M1 Ultra is the latest CPU, it still uses A14/M1 cores from 2020. It's likely that Apple made a lot of progress on the microarchitecture since then, plus rumors are that M2 will switch to a 4nm node.

Re:Apple M1 Ultra's 64-Core GPU Fails to Dethrone the Mighty... by komuher on Friday March 18, 2022 @08:28AM (#30721304)
Samsung 8nm was almost 2 years old when rtx 3090 was coming to the market (english isnt my native language in my head it was clearer :D)

Apple is on TSMC 5nm here comment from 2years ago about 8nm samsung vs 7nm TSMC

"Hell, Samsung 8nm is really a 10nm process, it's just an extension of Samsung 10nm with a ~15-20% improvement in transistor density.

TSMC 7nm (EUV 4 layer) is nearly twice as dense as Samsung 8nm. non-EUV (first gen TSMC 7nm) is still far denser than Samsung 8nm."

Re:Apple M1 Ultra's 64-Core GPU Fails to Dethrone the Mighty... by nottorp on Friday March 18, 2022 @12:50PM (#30724533)
> considering apple propaganda of FASTEST CONSUMER GPU

Well as a mostly Apple user, I don't read Apple propaganda. Or nvidia propaganda for that matter.

The M1 Max mac studio's full system consumption on load seems to be ~50 W. I wonder how much performance nvidia can deliver with that. I think ... they simply don't have a product in that power budget?

I know most people only care about FASTEST CONSUMER GPU (yay, it doubles as a leaf blower and a space heater) but I still think nvidia's best product was the 1050Ti ... decent 1080 performance in 75 W.

Re:Apple M1 Ultra's 64-Core GPU Fails to Dethrone the Mighty... by nacs on Friday March 18, 2022 @10:53AM (#30723047)
Try to actually buy the 3090 RTX anywhere.

It's out of stock just about everywhere and the few places that you can get it have scalpers charging thousands for it.

A standalone GPU that consumes multiple times more power than the M1, is a massive brick of hardware and is impossible to get for most consumers performs better? Shocking.

Re:Apple M1 Ultra's 64-Core GPU Fails to Dethrone the Mighty... by chdoyle on Friday March 18, 2022 @12:47PM (#30724509)
3090s are in stock now, for example Best Buy and direct from EVGA.
Re:Apple M1 Ultra's 64-Core GPU Fails to Dethrone the Mighty... by jsjohnst on Saturday March 19, 2022 @02:25PM (#30736294)
That’s a very disingenuous take on “in stock”. Sure, if you’re willing to pay multiples of MSRP, major retailers will now take your money too and not just let scalpers only get in on the profits.