Re:The succession drama at Scholastic
by crackercrews on Friday March 18, 2022 @01:44AM
(#30719081)
> instead of passing the company to his sons he gives control to the chief of strategy who has been with the company for decades
There are two issues here: the wealth and the control of the company. I don't think it would have been terribly noteworthy if he'd split up his ownership. He could have given his ex-girlfriend voting shares and his sons shares with financial value. But that's not what happened. The whole bundle went to the ex-girlfriend, which is a bit of a strange occurrence.
Re:The succession drama at Scholastic
by georgeecollins on Friday March 18, 2022 @02:20AM
(#30719190)
But his choice. That's how things work. See: King Lear.
"There are two issues here: the wealth and the control of the company. "
No there isn't. It's being run the same. It's baseless mouth piece.
I, too, abstract away drama in my dismissive summary so I can claim there's no drama.
Re:The succession drama at Scholastic
by thematrixturtle on Friday March 18, 2022 @03:53AM
(#30719623)
I mean, there's drama, but it doesn't seem like particularly interesting drama from HN's point of view: more gossip than "anything that gratifies one's intellectual curiosity".
The article is alright if you want some background on Scholastic and Dick Robinson, but there is really no deeper story here.