Re:Court finds calling stuff open source when it's not is fa...
by kube-system on Thursday March 17, 2022 @02:49PM
(#30714558)
They don't claim to own it, because they legally do not have a right to it. They tried to register it and failed.
They are the Open Source Initiative, stewards of the Open Source Definition.
The closest I see is a rule then when you're using the OSI trademark or logo you need to follow their definition of "Open Source".