News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Antiproton Orbiting Helium Ion by puzzledobserver on Wednesday March 16, 2022 @01:31PM (#30701646)
I am not a physicist, but I suppose it is because the s-orbital has an amplitude peak at r=0?

In other words, it is not so much the antiproton falling to the nuclear surface as much as the antiproton finding itself at the nuclear surface.

EDIT: The context is that the antiproton was in an orbital with large principal and azimuthal quantum numbers. Still, there would be some non-zero probability of the antiproton finding itself close to the nucleus, no?

Re:Antiproton Orbiting Helium Ion by jbay808 on Wednesday March 16, 2022 @01:35PM (#30701681)
Could we keep it perpetually in an excited state that has no amplitude at the centre?
Re:Antiproton Orbiting Helium Ion by marcosdumay on Wednesday March 16, 2022 @02:36PM (#30702368)
It reaches the nucleus by a process of tunneling. You can never completely stop it, but it reacts exponentially to you increasing a barrier.
Re:Antiproton Orbiting Helium Ion by jbay808 on Wednesday March 16, 2022 @04:49PM (#30703897)
An excited state isn't a barrier, it's a state with a higher energy than ground state. Several non-ground-state orbitals have a wavefunction whose amplitude drops to zero toward the centre.

An electron won't tunnel to a location where its wavefunction amplitude is zero.

Re:Antiproton Orbiting Helium Ion by zardo on Thursday March 17, 2022 @01:43AM (#30708046)
Practical applications, a laser that explodes if you turn it off.