Re:Why code review beats testing: evidence from decades of p...
by kevinburke on Monday October 03, 2011 @10:38PM
(#3069113)
There have been a number of papers showing that total number of bugs is a pretty good heuristic for code quality.
I agree that it's hard to tell which is picking out more important bugs. My guess is that less prominent papers by the same authors get into the topic in more detail.
I agree that it's hard to tell which is picking out more important bugs. My guess is that less prominent papers by the same authors get into the topic in more detail.