News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Why code review beats testing: evidence from decades of programming research.

Re:Why code review beats testing: evidence from decades of p... by godarderik on Monday October 03, 2011 @09:44PM (#3068997)
"It’s well known that it’s more expensive to find bugs early on in program development."

I think that's a little backwards, shouldn't it say less expensive?

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why code review beats testing: evidence from decades of p... by kevinburke on Monday October 03, 2011 @09:55PM (#3069012)
Yes it should, nice catch, it's fixed now.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why code review beats testing: evidence from decades of p... by currere on Thursday October 06, 2011 @08:24AM (#3079834)
What I like about this is that by writing it the wrong way round you have collected plenty of evidence that your intended meaning is indeed well known!
[ Parent | on HN ]