News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Russian tanks in Ukraine are sprouting cages by NelsonMinar on Tuesday March 15, 2022 @10:49AM (#30686016)
It's also incredible how this discussion is entirely uninformed by the posted article. The reading presents several thoughtful explanations for the armor, along with reasons they don't quite make sense. Many comments here are from folks who clearly didn't read that but have Very Valuable Opinions to share. As if being a software engineer also makes you an expert in military armor.
Re:Russian tanks in Ukraine are sprouting cages by tyingq on Tuesday March 15, 2022 @10:58AM (#30686144)
>entirely uninformed by the posted article

It is paywalled.

Re:Russian tanks in Ukraine are sprouting cages by NelsonMinar on Tuesday March 15, 2022 @11:27AM (#30686510)
Yes, but the Economist paywall is quite generous. Also the top link here is an archive link to circumvent the paywall. Also extensions like Bypass Paywalls Clean work if for some reason you don't want to pay for the journalism you read.

The alternative we have here is a completely uninformed, speculative discussion.

Re:Russian tanks in Ukraine are sprouting cages by tyingq on Tuesday March 15, 2022 @11:57AM (#30686915)
>The alternative we have here is a completely uninformed, speculative discussion.

If you're talking about my other comments, they were paraphrasing similar articles I've read, rather than pure speculation. Keeping in mind that that any article is going to have speculation, as the Russians haven't said why they are doing it.

That "generous paywall" is showing me ~120 words.

Re:Russian tanks in Ukraine are sprouting cages by katcher on Tuesday March 15, 2022 @04:36PM (#30691267)
And the archive link someone posted has invalid certs.
Re:Russian tanks in Ukraine are sprouting cages by choko on Tuesday March 15, 2022 @09:11PM (#30694076)
Or perhaps we can just not post pay-walled BS? Someone was generous to post a mirror, and I was reminded WHY I don't pay for "journalistic" content.