From the article:
>Andre lives in an apartment thanks to a city-run housing program, but he doesn’t have a job other than selling flipped merchandise.
His apartment is partially funded by the government.
> Is there another word for a person that "can't be a productive member of society to fund his own living" other than homeless?
Not that I know of. Of the ones that come to mind:
"Poor" just implies you can't afford nice things, not necessarily that you can't hold down a job to sustain yourself
"jobless" just implies you currently don't have a job (ie. unemployed), not necessarily that it's a long term thing.
"NEET" is closer, but is more associated with people living in their parent's basements than of the people profiled in the article.
I guess you could use the term "long term jobless" or something, but it doesn't exactly roll off the tongue.
But he can fund his ability to physically live...in an apartment? Is there another word for a person that "can't be a productive member of society to fund his own living" other than homeless?
Seems like a weird colloquialism to try to adopt.