News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The case for induction cooking by esperent on Sunday March 13, 2022 @01:14AM (#30658460)
So essentially you should ignore this article and go find real scientifically researched info on this issue elsewhere. Anyone have any good links?

And sorry, I watched the first 30 seconds of that YouTube video and don't see any reason why I'd trust it any more than the times article.

Re:The case for induction cooking by Timpy on Sunday March 13, 2022 @03:12AM (#30658761)
The host Rollie Williams has a graduate degree in climate change, maybe his style isn't for everyone but he's clearly knowledge and passionate about the subject.
Re:The case for induction cooking by esperent on Sunday March 13, 2022 @08:38PM (#30667281)
Well, clearly passionate anyway.

Joking aside, I'm glad he is making these videos in that case. However, I'd say the target audience is teenagers so maybe it's not the best suited for this forum?

Re:The case for induction cooking by creatonez on Monday March 14, 2022 @05:56AM (#30670421)
> However, I'd say the target audience is teenagers

There's this weird generational gap on HN where HNers seem to think the generation born in 2000 are teenagers. They're not. They're 22 year olds.

Re:The case for induction cooking by yohannparis on Monday March 14, 2022 @08:50AM (#30671776)
Damn, I didn't knew that at 36 years old I was still a teenagers!? I knew North-American loved to class people by age group, but this is becoming silly.
Re:The case for induction cooking by mbg721 on Monday March 14, 2022 @08:52AM (#30671798)
36? How was Elvis on American Bandstand, Boomer?
Re:The case for induction cooking by wolverine876 on Sunday March 13, 2022 @05:21PM (#30665851)
The NY Times has and talks to many people who are as well or more qualified. Look at the sources in their articles - not just graduate degrees, but leading experts with decades of experience.