Re:WHO advises Ukraine to destroy health lab pathogens to pr...
by LittleMoveBig on Friday March 11, 2022 @12:40PM
(#30643197)
"health labs" doing a lot of work in this headline. The WHO says they want to prevent "accidental or deliberate release of pathogens." If the pathogens can be intentionally released and cause harm, in what sense are they not bioweapons?
Re:WHO advises Ukraine to destroy health lab pathogens to pr...
by troon-lover on Friday March 11, 2022 @01:59PM
(#30644444)
Yes. In 2020 a virus was released in Wuhan, and was weaponized by the host country shutting down domestic flights while allowing infected to fly internationally.
Historically this led to a pretty crazy couple of years and we’re still seeing a lot of disruption from it.
It’s not good for the US to be funding bioweapon research within hostile countries or on the border of hostile countries.
Re:WHO advises Ukraine to destroy health lab pathogens to pr...
by Jimmc414 on Friday March 11, 2022 @07:33PM
(#30647830)
Not necessarily. The "weaponized" anthrax from the 2001 anthrax attack was much deadlier than naturally occurring anthrax. The spore coats were silicon coated and combined with charged nanoparticles for maximum disbursal. It may have been an exaggeration, but it was speculated that one light bulb full of weaponized anthrax could potentially wipe out a small city.
So, it is a bioweapons lab?
Of course, not -- it's just a health lab that happens to produce bioweapons -- two totally different things.
Or alternatively ban all bio research including vaccine development because potentially they can be used as weapons?
Historically this led to a pretty crazy couple of years and we’re still seeing a lot of disruption from it.
It’s not good for the US to be funding bioweapon research within hostile countries or on the border of hostile countries.