News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Twitter makes it harder to choose the old reverse-chronological feed. Parent comment

Re:Twitter makes it harder to choose the old reverse-chronol... by oblio on Friday March 11, 2022 @09:14AM (#30640135)
Well, considering the context of this thread, are there any social networks not working based on the Silicon Valley model? I don't know any.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Twitter makes it harder to choose the old reverse-chronol... by Nextgrid on Friday March 11, 2022 @01:20PM (#30643832)
The phone company? You pay them a fee for access and that's it - they have no incentive to prioritize certain callers over others for "engagement"'s sake.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Twitter makes it harder to choose the old reverse-chronol... by oblio on Friday March 11, 2022 @02:27PM (#30644844)
In this context social networks = social media = Facebook, Instagram, TikTok and their ilk, we can't really include AT&T in this conversation :-)
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Twitter makes it harder to choose the old reverse-chronol... by Nextgrid on Friday March 11, 2022 @02:28PM (#30644865)
Why not? My point is that a communications network doesn't have to be hostile. It is possible to run a communications platform and get people to pay for it.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Twitter makes it harder to choose the old reverse-chronol... by oblio on Friday March 11, 2022 @03:04PM (#30645317)
Back in the day? Maybe. Today? Yeah, sure you could create something and try to charge people, but most people are now used to free + ads.

You'll never get enough traction to break through to the mainstream, unless something radical changes.

[ Parent | on HN ]