Re:AWS's us-east-1 region is experiencing issues
by 9wzYQbTYsAIc on Wednesday March 09, 2022 @07:36PM
(#30621861)
> What's the point of cloud if we have to manage robustness of their own infrastructure.
Worth deliberating on. I’m curious as to what the lifetime cost of ownership for an on-prem data center is relative to lifetime cost of operating in the cloud.
Re:AWS's us-east-1 region is experiencing issues
by thedougd on Wednesday March 09, 2022 @04:32PM
(#30620275)
They would simply charge for the privilege. An EC2 'always on' or whatever option that enabled your instance to live migrate between availability zones would be a nice and expensive option.
Re:AWS's us-east-1 region is experiencing issues
by systemvoltage on Wednesday March 09, 2022 @04:38PM
(#30620357)
Definitely. Then I wonder why we need the cloud :) if not for services (not EC2). Lot of mid-sized companies are re-evaluating: https://www.economist.com/business/2021/07/03/do-the-costs-o...
What's the point of cloud if we have to manage robustness of their own infrastructure. I can understand if that's due to natural disasters and earthquakes, but the idea should be that a single AZ should never go down barring extraordinary circumstances. AWS should be auto-balancing, handling downtimes of a single AZ without the customer ever noticing it.
It might not be a good analogy, but if a single Cloudflare edge datacenter goes down, it will automatically route traffic through others. Transparent and painless to the customer. I understand AWS is huge, and different services have different redundancy mechanisms, but just conceptually it feels like they're in a conflict of interest to increase robustness of their data centers - "We told you to have multi-AZ deployment, not our fault".
Another way to put this is make sure as an AWS customer, to 3x multiply all costs + management of multi-AZ deployment into your total costs.