News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:M1 Ultra Geekbench Score by qball on Tuesday March 08, 2022 @08:11PM (#30609791)
>It's just not fashionable to say good things about Intel right now.

Well, being single-handedly responsible for the nearly complete stagnation in processor performance for 10 out of the last 12 years probably has something to do with that.

That said, Intel's products and their performance are indeed quite underrated especially once you consider that they're being generated on a relatively old process node; it will be interesting to see what kind of performance they'll be able to wring out at 5 or 7nm.

Re:M1 Ultra Geekbench Score by bushbaba on Tuesday March 08, 2022 @09:46PM (#30610373)
Something to recognize is that tsmc’s 5nm can do 171M/mm2 where-as intel’s 7nm can do 200-259M/mm2.

M = millions of transitors

Re:M1 Ultra Geekbench Score by cjbgkagh on Tuesday March 08, 2022 @10:18PM (#30610525)
I’ve always assumed that Intels terrible corporate culture was responsible for that stagnation (told to me by former Intel employees). What upset me was the pointlessness of having their employees suffer that culture and then the rest of the world suffer the lack of progress.
Re:M1 Ultra Geekbench Score by RachelF on Wednesday March 09, 2022 @01:03AM (#30611387)
...that and the lack of any real competition

Nothing focusses the mind like a real competitor.

Re:M1 Ultra Geekbench Score by arvinsim on Tuesday March 08, 2022 @08:39PM (#30610017)
It would be interesting to see how x86 fares against ARM on the same node size.