News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:America produces enough oil to meet its needs, so why do ... by brokencode on Tuesday March 08, 2022 @04:31PM (#30607359)
The point is that we need to use fracking to extract much of the oil in the United States, as opposed to less destructive techniques that can be used in other oil fields. It’s not NIMBY if it truly is worse when it happens in your backyard.
Re:America produces enough oil to meet its needs, so why do ... by yyyk on Tuesday March 08, 2022 @06:59PM (#30609127)
>fracking to extract much of the oil in the United States, as opposed to less destructive techniques that can be used in other oil fields

Is fracking really worse overall? One can screw up non-fracking oil methods too, e.g. Nigerian oil delta, BP oil spill, etc.

Re:America produces enough oil to meet its needs, so why do ... by fredophile on Tuesday March 08, 2022 @06:16PM (#30608693)
I'm not sure that was the original point. If extracting oil results in $x of long term damage to the local environment, but that cost isn't passed along, it makes economic sense to buy oil from somewhere else so you don't end up footing that bill. Sure it would be better overall if that other place could extract oil without that cost but that doesn't make the decision less rational even if that environmental cost is as much or more than it would be to extract it locally.
Re:America produces enough oil to meet its needs, so why do ... by techNoob123 on Tuesday March 08, 2022 @06:25PM (#30608782)
i think what’s missing is that fracking is used in the U.S.

non-fracking methods are used outside the U.S.

fracking is worse for the environment than non-fracking methods.

i hold my personal opinions on each point but i think this is what OP was trying to convey