News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The new silent majority: People who don't tweet by vorpalhex on Tuesday March 08, 2022 @03:47PM (#30606671)
1. It was an order, not a law

2. It was a clarification of existing rules

3. It does not make "supporting your child's gender transition" a jailable offense.

The order says subjecting a child to invasive medical procedure can be abuse, and that doctors and teachers have a legal requirement to report abuse.

Here is the order for your reading pleasure:

https://gov.texas.gov/news/post/governor-abbott-directs-dfps...

Re:The new silent majority: People who don't tweet by Dylan16807 on Tuesday March 08, 2022 @04:30PM (#30607341)
"As OAG Opinion No. KP-0401 makes clear, it is already against the law to subject Texas children to a wide variety of elective procedures for gender transitioning, including reassignment surgeries that can cause sterilization, mastectomies, removals of otherwise healthy body parts, and administration of puberty-blocking drugs or supraphysiologic doses of testosterone or estrogen."

Where "subject" appears to be the most general form possible, as far as I can tell from context.

Even puberty blockers are on this list! You're not supporting a gender transition if you can't touch hormones at all.

Re:The new silent majority: People who don't tweet by CRConrad on Friday March 11, 2022 @02:18PM (#30644713)
> "As OAG Opinion No. KP-0401 makes clear, it is already against the law to subject Texas children to ... removals of otherwise healthy body parts"

Wow, finally a law against infant male circumcision!

In Texas, of all places; whodathunkit.