I'm not a lawyer, but when I was helping write agreements for my dad with tenants he had - it seemed like a no-brainer to include "this means, if X does not happen by 11:59pm of Y date, Z will apply".
ps - I'm angry at any contract agreement where the date can be interpreted as "end of day, 11:59pm" or "the day, which starts at 0:01am"
Not surprising the same thing can happen in contracts; they're both written by humans. And you can't unit test a contract! (ignoring smart contracts for now)
There are definitely edge cases, but it doesn't feel too hard to specify a "catch all", and if the other party doesn't like it, they should clarify those terms too. Feels easy enough. Reminds me of "burden of proof tennis" - if the catch-all isn't satisfactory to you, carve out an exception the other party accepts.
Many laws are written in English in the first place though (the president can sign either form), sadly it's sometimes a decade or more before an official translation is made. A secondary problem is the insistence of a defendant to have his trial heard in the Irish language, or have Irish forms of the various laws/summons/transgressions. We usually call those people "cute hoors".
https://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/25/business/worldbusiness/25...
Whenever I’m looking for a legal loophole, I’ll take a look at the French translation of the law.