Re:On resuming discord.py development
by benatkin on Saturday March 05, 2022 @11:54PM
(#30575137)
In the article the author said:
> I was hopeful that after half a year that there would be a clear alternative library that most users can transparently migrate to, but it seems that this never ended up materialising.
So I think the author agrees it would be nice if the ecosystem kept moving forward.
pycord is a fork. Why didn't the author of pycord start a new project? I think the author of the article was hoping for a new project that isn't a fork.
> I was hopeful that after half a year that there would be a clear alternative library that most users can transparently migrate to, but it seems that this never ended up materialising.
So I think the author agrees it would be nice if the ecosystem kept moving forward.
pycord is a fork. Why didn't the author of pycord start a new project? I think the author of the article was hoping for a new project that isn't a fork.