Re:The downside of encouraging ‘the fight’ on the streets of...
by 683686285 on Saturday March 05, 2022 @07:46AM
(#30567062)
Why do you assume they expect “the country” to do anything for them? I certainly don't want “the country” to do anything for me and I don't want to do anything for “the country” that I wouldn't do for anyone.
Also, anyone who want men but not women to be forced to fight is not a feminist.
Re:The downside of encouraging ‘the fight’ on the streets of...
by SyzygistSix on Saturday March 05, 2022 @08:30AM
(#30567392)
> Now let me dose it with gasoline: Not many hardcore “feminists” around.. where did they go?
I would guess many are fighting or supporting the war effort and their country in other ways. Also leaving with your kids doesn't mean one is less feminist, just that you want less of your family to die. Compliance doesn't equal agreement.
Re:The downside of encouraging ‘the fight’ on the streets of...
by PedroBatista on Saturday March 05, 2022 @08:56AM
(#30567629)
I was being snarky, but I didn't equate "feminists" to females, let alone with children. It wasn't any statement with content, just a tease.
While compliance doesn't equal agreement, let's not fall in the trap that non-compliance will solve the problem. The enemy ( which is what it is atm ) isn't some old fat C-suites that rollover when "their twitter explodes" and they have to work on the weekend instead of go boating.
You expect “the country” to do things for you ( while you pay taxes), now “the country” expects you to do things for it.
That’s how it has been working for many centuries and applies to any society, even the stable and peaceful ones.
Now let me dose it with gasoline: Not many hardcore “feminists” around.. where did they go? :)