Cybercriminals who breached Nvidia issue one of the most unusual demands ever

Re:Cybercriminals who breached Nvidia issue one of the most ... by throw10920 on Friday March 04, 2022 @03:51PM (#30560376)

The parent comment makes no mention of giving Nvidia control over the GPU. You know you can have remote access features that are solely under your control, right? That's how SSH works.

You should read comments before you reply to them.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Cybercriminals who breached Nvidia issue one of the most ... by mattwilsonn888 on Friday March 04, 2022 @10:48PM (#30564060)

This is so painfully pedantic and obviously not what the original commenter meant. What point would a remote killswitch have to deter crypto miners if the owner of the card (the crypto miner) fully controlled it as you imply. Use your head.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Cybercriminals who breached Nvidia issue one of the most ... by zelon88 on Friday March 04, 2022 @06:47PM (#30562172)

> I'd buy a card that could be remotely disabled when usage patterns matched crypto mining...

What does LHR and SSH have in common? How does 3rd party LHR make any sense.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Cybercriminals who breached Nvidia issue one of the most ... by fomine3 on Sunday March 06, 2022 @09:33PM (#30583581)

You may feel you own Windows.

[ Parent | on HN ]