Re:Cybercriminals who breached Nvidia issue one of the most ...
by pabs3 on Friday March 04, 2022 @05:48PM
(#30561665)
This was like 15 years ago (no idea about power savings stuff), I wouldn't touch the proprietary driver any more though.
nouveau has been extremely stable for me when I used it up until last year.
Patches contain parts of the original code, so I would class them as modified versions of the original code. Also the initial modification isn't allowed either, I wasn't really referring to distribution of the patches, just creating them isn't allowed AFAIK.
Re:Cybercriminals who breached Nvidia issue one of the most ...
by NavinF on Saturday March 05, 2022 @06:41PM
(#30573178)
You’re talking about the EULA, not the copyright license. The EULA can certainly claim you’re not allowed to do that, but it’s also unenforceable in most places so who cares?
Re:Cybercriminals who breached Nvidia issue one of the most ...
by pabs3 on Saturday March 05, 2022 @07:01PM
(#30573357)
I'm talking about neither the EULA nor the copyright license, but about copyright law, which doesn't allow modifications by default. Only a EULA or other license can then allow modifications.
OTOH, even the GPL is pretty much unenforceable these days, unless you are well funded enough to afford time consuming legal cases.
It’s a polished turd, but at least it works which is more than I can say for nouveau
And yes you can distribute patches. Copyright only prevents you from distributing the modified version.