News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Unlicense is an inferior license wrapped in an atroci... by contravariant on Friday March 04, 2022 @08:37AM (#30554513)
Arguably allowing your work to be used by anyone except Google is a feature not a bug.
Re:The Unlicense is an inferior license wrapped in an atroci... by 683686285 on Friday March 04, 2022 @08:49AM (#30554664)
I assume Google's legal department is not irrational and that they are worrying about something that could happen to anyone.
Re:The Unlicense is an inferior license wrapped in an atroci... by marcosdumay on Friday March 04, 2022 @10:54AM (#30556441)
Hum... Rational (from the point of view of the entire enterprise) bureaucracy bodies probably exist, but they are not common. But that second part "something that could happen to anyone" is completely unfounded. It may be because of something that could happen to you, or it may not. There is no reason to assume either way.

As people keep ignoring on the context of software architecture, you are not Google.

Re:The Unlicense is an inferior license wrapped in an atroci... by Bostonian on Friday March 04, 2022 @08:43AM (#30554592)
You publish open source code so that others can benefit from it, and if Google uses it maybe billions of people will benefit from it, so I disagree.
Re:The Unlicense is an inferior license wrapped in an atroci... by maeln on Friday March 04, 2022 @09:01AM (#30554804)
Everyone has different reason to publish their code using open-source license. I like sharing my code but I don't like when multi-billion dollar company make a profit from it for example. Ofc, that's what I agreed to when I release my code under open-source license, but we are all free to have different sentiment about it.
Re:The Unlicense is an inferior license wrapped in an atroci... by i80and on Friday March 04, 2022 @08:58AM (#30554767)
This is an individual choice; people have motivations beyond "maximize usage of my code".