Re:How “latency numbers everybody should know” decreased fro...
by thfuran on Thursday March 03, 2022 @05:21PM
(#30547842)
Which latency are you suggesting is limited by the speed of light?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:How “latency numbers everybody should know” decreased fro...
by not2b on Thursday March 03, 2022 @05:41PM
(#30548033)
It wasn't the speed of light, it was the size of atoms that was the issue here. As old-style scaling (the kind used up until about 2003) continued, leakage power was increasing rapidly because charge carriers (electrons / holes) would tunnel through gates (I'm simplifying a bit here, other bad effects were also a factor). It was no longer possible to keep increasing clock frequency while scaling down feature size. Further reduction without exploding the power requirement meant that the clock frequency had to be left the same and transistors needed to change shape.
Re:How “latency numbers everybody should know” decreased fro...
by nightpool on Thursday March 03, 2022 @06:04PM
(#30548256)
"Packet roundtrip CA to Netherlands"
Re:How “latency numbers everybody should know” decreased fro...
by thfuran on Thursday March 03, 2022 @07:32PM
(#30548996)
No, at the speed of light 150 ms is about long enough to send a packet from SF to Amsterdam and then send the reply back the long way around the entire rest of the planet.