That was my impression as well. Unless we're missing additional context - I don't see what's so outrageous about that message, except that "mostly offline" doesn't make any sense.
Yeah, DHH's bafflement over the "mostly offline" part is probably the one aspect of his reaction I actually agree with - I don't get that part.
Not sure how being "online" matters, when DHH (as he points out at length) has had a pretty packed year of Rails progress. Maybe RailsConf has had a hard time getting in touch with him?
DHH has jumped right to the conclusion that RailsConf has some kind of problem with him. Perhaps, but if that was really the case, it seems like they would have just declined to invite him entirely? "Hey, we have a problem with this guy. Let's only let him talk for some of the keynote!"
Re:No RailsConf
by sleepyhead on Friday March 04, 2022 @05:02AM
(#30552678)
Perhaps based on him using Twitter as a one-way communication the last year. Not replying to others. Turned off replies for his own tweets.
But yeah, poorly worded and unnecessary.
I read it as a euphemism for "give other contributors a chance at presenting the opening keynote going forward, not you (DHH) every year by default". It is vaguely worded, so I suppose they could mean sharing in the sense of spreading this year's keynote across multiple presenters, but in the context of the past year it wouldn't surprise me at all if this was RailsConf's way of uninviting DHH.
Re:No RailsConf
by ghiculescu on Thursday March 03, 2022 @01:26PM
(#30544718)
How do you share a keynote? The dude can talk for hours.
It seems to me (and I guess to him?) like a politely worded way of asking him to not come at all.
No one asked him not to come.
It doesn't sound like he's being asked not to participate. What am I missing?