If that book is a bit one-sided, it has to be mentioned that (as other comments in this thread have noted) the other side also had their share of one-sided publications highlighting the Broad Institute's contribution and minimizing the merits of the other scientists involved, such as this article by Eric Lander: https://www.cell.com/fulltext/S0092-8674(15)01705-5 (reviewed here: https://genotopia.scienceblog.com/573/a-whig-history-of-cris...).