News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ask HN: What do you read for a more objective view on the... by farseer on Monday February 28, 2022 @03:03AM (#30497500)
US was the aggressor in Iraq but did not suffer the same repercussions as Russia has mostly because of its economic influence but also because a European theater attracts more eyeballs than killing brown people far off somewhere.
Re:Ask HN: What do you read for a more objective view on the... by pasabagi on Monday February 28, 2022 @08:41AM (#30499677)
I think the repercussions of Iraq have been slow to emerge, but they have been profound. First, a precipitous decline in the moral authority of the US. Second, a collapse in trust in US intelligence. Third, a collapse in the reputation of the US as a reliable and rational partner.

At the time, bear in mind that this was the heyday of liberal interventionism, and people saw Saddam Hussein as a bloody-handed dictator, engaged in sectarian and ethnic cleansing, who was destabilizing the region. The experiences of the NATO intervention in Yugoslavia suggested that this problem could be resolved through regime change. It wasn't possible to know at the time how badly this would turn out.

Re:Ask HN: What do you read for a more objective view on the... by whythre on Monday February 28, 2022 @03:26AM (#30497638)
That’s one read. There is also the idea that lashing out against real or perceived threats to America was seen as justified in the wake of 9/11. And the US squandered whatever sympathy they had by screwing around in Iraq and conveniently ignoring the likelihood that Bin Laden had fled out of Afghanistan into Pakistan.