News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A professor who beat roulette by Nullabillity on Sunday February 27, 2022 @01:30PM (#30491041)
> That is unambiguously claiming not just a contingent bias, but a bias contingent on the previous three rounds.

No it isn't, only that three rounds may be enough to predict the bias. Whether the bias actually depends on previous results is irrelevant to the quote.

Re:A professor who beat roulette by lisper on Sunday February 27, 2022 @01:39PM (#30491148)
> three rounds may be enough to predict the bias

That is an even more absurd claim.