Was totally unaware of this. The Readme:

> For now it's closer to an alternative with most deviations appearing in the standard library, mostly in the form of deleting much of it.

Yikes. I've found that languages with a small standard library have deep dependency trees for imported packages. I hope this is a stepping stone to a different standard library, rather than an end goal in-and-of itself.

Actually the phrasing in the readme is not correct - I will change it later, but now I want to say that the objective is not deleting "much" of it, but rather cleaning up old and deprecated modules, or providing alternative solutions (for things like os/json that historically were a point of friction).

> A lot of previous contributors

Not really. The fork looks pretty dormant.

I think better phrasing would indeed be something like "several former core developers" - of course we can't really measure up to the size of the original community, and don't yet have any paid developers (like Araq and narimiran [1] in the mainline - although since the end of September there were not a lot of activity on their part as well - [2] ~30 commits (~23 that are marked `[backport]`) and even less [3] for narimiran)

[1] https://forum.nim-lang.org/t/8540#55418

[2] https://github.com/nim-lang/Nim/commits/devel?author=Araq

[3] https://github.com/nim-lang/Nim/commits/devel?author=narimir...

Right now, it seems like most of the work on the mainline seems to be done by community members.